Strategic objectives for the period from 1431 - 1435:
|
The first strategic objective: Draw a policy of quality and academic accreditation at the university level |
|
The rate of implementation during the next five years |
Supervisor of the implementation |
Already implemented? |
Responsibility for implementation |
Items |
|
Notes |
3 |
2 |
1 |
No |
Yes |
|
|
√ |
√ |
V.P. for Studies, Development and Community Service |
|
√ |
Deanship of Quality Assurance & Academic Accreditation |
(1) Develop an action plan for quality and academic accreditation at the university level. |
|
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA |
|
√ |
Quality Unit |
(2) Implement the plan |
|
Item |
Resources needed |
Performance Indicators |
|
1 |
Committee of Experts |
• Meeting to action plan targets • The existence of an agreed plan at the university level |
|
2 |
|
• Committee Reports • Initial reports on the plan |
|
The second strategic objective: to continue to promote a culture of quality and academic accreditation at the university. |
|
The rate of implementation during the next five years |
Supervisor of the implementation |
Already implemented? |
Responsibility for implementation |
Items |
|
Notes |
3 |
2 |
1 |
No |
Yes |
|
In progress |
|
|
|
Dean of DQAAA |
|
√ |
Deanship of Quality Assurance & Academic Accreditation |
(1) Preparation of the QMS |
|
|
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA |
|
√ |
Deanship of Quality Assurance & Academic Accreditation |
(2) Respond to all identified quality assurance and academic accreditation needs of the community by preparing and presenting workshops |
|
|
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA |
|
√ |
Deanship of quality assurance and accreditation in coordination with the Department of Public Relations and Dean of Student Affairs |
(3) Promote the role of the media department to ensure across all units of the university that there is effective communication of the quality culture and accreditation process |
|
|
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA |
|
√ |
Deanship of Quality Assurance & Academic Accreditation |
(4) Adoption of a quality culture across the university |
|
Item |
Resources needed |
Performance Indicators |
|
1 |
External Experts |
• Existence of an agreed Quality Management System owned by the University. |
|
2 |
Experienced presenters |
• Implementing the workshops. |
|
3 |
Department of Media |
• The community is receiving a clear communication. |
|
4 |
The whole community of the University |
• Everybody recognizing their responsibilities and the commitment needed to achieve this quality culture. |
|
The third strategic goal: access to institutional accreditation and program for the largest possible number of scientific programs at the university |
|
The rate of implementation during the next five years |
Supervisor of the implementation |
Is the implementation |
Responsibility for implementation |
Items |
|
Notes |
3 |
2 |
1 |
No |
Yes |
|
|
√ |
√ |
University Administration |
|
√ |
DQAAA (Program Accreditation Unit, Institutional Accreditation Unit) |
(1) Support Colleges in achieving professional body recognition through accreditation. |
|
In progress |
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA & deans of colleges |
|
√ |
DQAAA (Program Accreditation Unit) |
(2) To obtain accreditation for at least ten programs |
|
|
√ |
√ |
Dean of DQAAA & Deans of colleges |
|
√ |
DQAAA (Program Accreditation Unit) |
(3) To continue to evaluate the performance of colleges and programs and to enhance their quality |
|
Item |
Resources needed |
Performance Indicators |
|
1 |
• specialized committees • specialists |
•Institutional approval that all Accreditation Applications are of a high standard. |
|
2 |
Specialized committee in the evaluation of performance and continue to improve |
Committee Reports • Initial reports on the plan
All colleges meeting the QA regulations of the University |
|
3 |
• Human resources and material available at the Deanship of quality assurance and academic accreditation • Experts and specialists from outside the university |
• the number of programs that have been evaluated • the number of periodic reports to receive Data by programs in relation to the assessment of performance and quality improvement • continuity in the process of evaluation of performance and distribution of the appropriate time • the impact of this activity on the performance of the various programs through questionnaires |
|
4 |
• Human Resources and Finance in the Deanship of quality assurance and academic accreditation • Sources in the colleges • experts from outside the university |
10 programs gain Academic Accreditation |